Home

Inconvenient choices for women are refocusing – fairness to the “self” or to the children?

Leave a comment

Terrific letter to the editor, Wall Street Journal, April 30, 2013 (reprinted in full):

“Parenting is supposed to be inconvenient. If you don’t have the money for a chauffeur to drive your children to music lessons, sporting events, doctor’s appointments, or the zillion other places they need to go, the job falls to you. If you don’t have the money for a private tutor to actually teach your children the things they should be learning in public school but aren’t taught, the teaching job falls to you. Most children need direct instruction—they use their computers for entertainment. And unless you have family living nearby with a vested interest in your child, spending time reading to them falls to you as well. Reading to a child does engender a love of reading. It does make a difference. Inconvenient? Time consuming? Yes.”

“What happens to careers due to these inconvenient demands? They won’t be as stellar as they might have been if we had chosen to live alone and pursue a self-oriented life. It is called choice. We all have to make choices. If you chose to have children, it is about sacrifice.”

“Is it fair that many women have to sacrifice their career ambitions because of the inconvenience of parenting? No. But, what about fairness to our children? Is it fair to be born into dual-career households and raised by hired help who couldn’t care less whether the children are doing homework or stuffing Oreos and playing videogames as long as they’re quiet? Is it fair to children, who when they turn the ripe old age of 12, to be left to navigate the roughest years of their life, adolescence, alone? With an empty house, YouTube, Twitter, iPhones and their friends to guide them, they will surely be just fine, right? Maybe it is about time that society has started leaning on mothers and fathers to go the extra yard, spend those extra hours even if it means compromising when it comes to careers. Our children really do need us. And they usually need us the most when it is inconvenient.”

Mary M. Glaser, Simsbury, Conn.

Advertisements

A new happy warrier brings the right message to Politichick.

Leave a comment

Chicago’s struggling families, especially their children, are taking the heat ignited by outside activists – where are the police in this picture?

Leave a comment

Read about the school closing protest in Chicago; it is a sorry day for a once great city.

Sad evidence is in – Chicago teachers union has been taken over by trained communist agitators, a.k.a. thugs

Leave a comment

Every suburban moderate who knows a public school teacher in Chicago needs to wake up and take ownership of this movement – whether they are teachers, union sympathizers, or professional agitators, these protest crowds have been pre-trained to promote anarchy in an already volatile environment. The real victims are the students who are losing their schools and their education and the possibility for advancement out of poverty and squalor. Every person who has supported the Democrat Machine that has ruled Chicago for decades is responsible. Period. Full stop. Chicago is the new Detroit, and headed downhill from there.

Chicago Public School parents air their (real) grievances about a city in its death throes.

Leave a comment

OK, we hear ya’: teachers unions fight for Unity! Strength! Power! (Kids? Not so much.)

Leave a comment

Karen Lewis of the Chicago Teachers Union reaches her peak at about the 12-minute spot on the video. 12/2/12

Compromise against the Chicago Democrat Machine? No way. Not possible.

Leave a comment

Watch this in full screen for the full effect. Show your support at http://mckinleyforcongress.com/.

H/T LegalInsurrection.com

Older Entries